SUO 2020
SUO 2020
SUO 2020: Adverse Event Profile for Combination Chemoimmunotherapy Compared to Chemotherapy in Solid Organ Malignancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
SUO 2020: Perioperative Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
SUO 2020: Clinically Node-Positive Bladder Cancer – Pro Surgery
SUO 2020: Real-World Application of Pre-Orchiectomy miR-371A-3P Test in Testicular Germ Cell Tumor Management
SUO 2020: Oncologic Outcomes of Mohs Surgery for Localized Penile Carcinoma: A 10-Year Retrospective Study
(UroToday.com) Penile cancer is a rare malignancy with an annual incidence of 0.1-0.7 in 100,000 men, which accounts for fewer than 1% of male cancers in the United States. Treatment is often associated with considerable mutilation and changes to quality of life. Organ sparing surgery for the management of localized penile cancer has the potential to maintain penile form and function while achieving equivalent oncologic control as partial or total penectomy. Furthermore, Mohs surgery is efficacious for the treatment of non-genital and cutaneous cancers first pioneered by Dr. Mohs for penile carcinoma in 1992 with a 5-year control rate of 94%. Although it is endorsed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for low-stage penile cancer management, there is a paucity of data on cancer outcomes in localized penile cancer. At the 2020 virtual annual meeting, 4th-year medical student Nicolas Alcala presented institutional work assessing oncologic outcomes in patients with localized penile carcinoma managed with Mohs surgery.
SUO 2020: Neoadjuvant Checkpoints: Exploring the Emerging Utility of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
SUO 2020: Advanced Kidney Cancer Update – “A Glimpse into the Future"
SUO 2020: Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
(UroToday.com) At this year's Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) annual meeting Vadim S. Koshkin presented on systemic therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma. The current state of first-line metastatic urothelial carcinoma is shown in Figure 1.
SUO 2020: The Future of Prostate Cancer Screening
(UroToday.com) At this year's Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) annual meeting Dr. Klein was awarded the prestigious Richard D. Williams prostate cancer research excellence award. In this session, he gave a presentation on prostate cancer screening and cancer screening in general.
SUO 2020: Management of “Node Only” M1 Metastatic Bladder Cancer- Against Surgery
SUO 2020: Debate: Neoadjuvant vs. Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma - Adjuvant
SUO 2020: Genomic Characterization of Residual Disease at Radical Cystectomy Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
(UroToday.com) During the Best of Bladder Cancer session during the 2020 Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) annual meeting, Dr. Andrew Lenis presented on his group’s experience with genomic characterization of cystectomy patients. Currently, the standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer is neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy. The majority of studies in this space have focused on chemotherapy treatment-naïve patients with the aim of preoperative risk stratification and treatment selection. However, current trials are investigating the role of adjuvant immunotherapy in patients with the chemo-resistant disease. For this reason, the group at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) sought to elucidate the molecular biology of chemo-resistant disease in order to help expand therapeutic options.
SUO 2020: Factors Associated with Decision Regret in Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy and Urinary Diversion
(UroToday.com) Dr. Elizabeth Green was invited to speak during the last bladder cancer session of the 2020 Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) annual meeting. Her group has investigated factors associated with decisional regret in patients undergoing radical cystectomy and urinary diversion.
SUO 2020: Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities In Adjuvant Therapy and Survival In Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumor: A Population-Based Study
SUO 2020: Debate: Neoadjuvant vs. Adjuvant Chemotherapy for UTUC - Neoadjuvant
(UroToday.com) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is the standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. However, upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is not the same as bladder cancer, with a higher rate of invasive disease. The survival of high grade and high stage disease UTUC remains poor (Figure 1), and downstaging in urothelial cancer is highly predictive of improved survival1.
SUO 2020: Emerging Management of Von Hippel-Lindau-associated Renal Cell Carcinoma
(UroToday.com) Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) syndrome is a rare, inherited disorder that causes tumors and cysts to grow in various parts of the body. Patients with VHL syndrome have an increased risk of certain types of cancer, especially kidney cancer and pancreatic cancer. The signs and symptoms of von Hippel-Lindau syndrome usually do not appear until young adulthood. Some of the manifestations of VHL include:
SUO 2020: Optimizing Management of High Risk Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer – Case Based Discussion
(UroToday.com) The plenary session of the last day of the 2020 Annual Meeting of the Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) began with a panel discussion stepping through the case of a patient with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.
SUO 2020: Molecular Characterization of NMIBC in the Clinical Context
(UroToday.com) In this presentation, opening the session on bladder cancer at the Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) 2020 meeting, Dr. Sfakianos gave a summarized overview of the molecular characterization of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).
SUO 2020: Next Generation Clinical Trial Design BCG-Unresponsive NMIBC
(UroToday.com) There have been several recent single-arm trials in the Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) setting (Table 1).
The first question that arises is whether these single-arm trials are enough or do we need to randomize patients for our future trials. As seen in Table 1, these treatments are given for a minimum of two years, requiring a high number of physician visits during these treatment years. To get more accurate information, we may need to consider randomizing these patients in the long run and compare these treatments head to head before making any informed decisions.