Reassessment of the Efficacy of Carboplatin for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma in the Era of Immunotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Context: Platinum-based combination chemotherapy is the standard treatment for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (AMUC). However, data comparing the efficacy of different platinum agents are limited.

Objective: This review aimed to assess the efficacy of carboplatin as a first-line treatment for AMUC using phase 3 randomized trial data.

Evidence acquisition: Multiple databases were searched for articles published until August 2021. Studies that compared overall survival (OS), complete response (CR), and objective response rates (ORRs) in chemotherapy-eligible patients with AMUC were deemed eligible.

Evidence synthesis: Four studies were included. Compared with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy, neither cisplatin- nor carboplatin-based chemotherapy was associated with significant OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85-1.11, p = 0.64 and HR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.78-1.04, p = 0.16, respectively) and CR (odds ratio [OR]: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.70-1.92, p = 0.57 and OR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.52-1.53, p = 0.67, respectively benefits, while both were associated with a favorable ORR (OR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.40-0.74, p < 0.001 and OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.42-0.80, p < 0.001, respectively). A network meta-analysis (NMA)-based indirect comparison between carboplatin and cisplatin revealed that while cisplatin was slightly better than carboplatin in terms of OS, CR, and ORR, no significant difference was noted.

Conclusions: Cisplatin- and carboplatin-based chemotherapies offer similar OS/CR benefits to ICI monotherapy and elicit a greater ORR than ICI monotherapy. Moreover, our NMA demonstrated that both cisplatin- and carboplatin-based chemotherapy have a similar efficacy in terms of OS, CR, and ORR. Given that carboplatin-based chemotherapy is shown to be more effective in contemporary series than in historical controls, it is strongly recommended that carboplatin be re-examined for its value in the era of ICIs and beyond.

Patient summary: Cisplatin- as well as carboplatin-based chemotherapy is as effective as immune checkpoint inhibitors in terms of survival and eliciting a positive response. It is currently believed that cisplatin provides greater benefits than carboplatin; this requires re-evaluation.

Keiichiro Mori,1 Victor M Schuettfort,2 Takafumi Yanagisawa,1 Satoshi Katayama,3 Benjamin Pradere,4 Ekaterina Laukhtina,5 Pawel Rajwa,6 Hadi Mostafaei,7 Reza Sari Motlagh,8 Fahad Quhal,9 Marco Moschini,10 Francesco Soria,11 Jeremy Y C Teoh,12 David D'Andrea,4 Mohammad Abufaraj,13 Simone Albisinni,14 Wojciech Krajewski,15 Shin Egawa,16 Pierre I Karakiewicz,17 Michael Rink,18 Shahrokh F Shariat19; European Association of Urology–Young Academic Urologists Urothelial Carcinoma Working Group (EAU-YAU)

  1. Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  2. Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  3. Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
  4. Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  5. Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
  6. Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland.
  7. Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
  8. Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  9. Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
  10. Klinik für Urologie, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.
  11. Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy.
  12. Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
  13. Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
  14. Department of Urology, University Clinics of Brussels, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
  15. Department of Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
  16. Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  17. Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
  18. Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  19. Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.

Source: Mori K, Schuettfort VM, Yanagisawa T, et al. Reassessment of the Efficacy of Carboplatin for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma in the Era of Immunotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8(6):1687-1695. 

Read an Expert Commentary by Bishoy Faltas, MD