Repeat post-op voiding trials: An inconvenient correlate with success - Abstract

AIMS: This study examined the association between the need for a repeat voiding trial after midurethral sling (MUS) surgery and 1-year success rates.

METHODS: We conducted this secondary analysis of the participants in the Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network trial of midurethral sling (TOMUS) study which compared retropubic versus transobturator MUS. A standard voiding trial was attempted on all subjects. The "repeat voiding trial" group included subjects discharged with catheterization. All others were considered "self voiding." Success rates between the groups at 1-year were compared, followed by multivariate analyses controlling for previously reported clinical predictors of success.

RESULTS: Most women (76%) were self-voiding, while 24% required a repeat voiding trial. The objective success rate at 1-year was 85.8% in the repeat voiding trial group and 75.3% in the self-voiding group (P = 0.01). Subjective success rate at 1-year was 61.0% in the repeat voiding trial group and 55.1% in the self-voiding group (P = 0.23). Women in the repeat voiding trial group continued to demonstrate greater objective success than the self-voiding group in multivariate analysis that controlled for previous incontinence surgery, pad weight, urethral mobility, urge score, and type of MUS (P = 0.04, OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.03-3.22).

CONCLUSIONS: Women who require a repeat voiding trial following MUS surgery have greater objective success at 1-year postoperatively when compared to those who are self-voiding at the time of discharge. These results may help reassure women who require catheterization after MUS surgery that their outcome is not compromised by this immediate transient post-operative result.

Written by:
Ferrante KL, Kim HY, Brubaker L, Wai CY, Norton PA, Kraus SR, Shepherd J, Sirls LT, Nager CW.   Are you the author?
University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.

Reference: Neurourol Urodyn. 2013 Aug 27. Epub ahead of print.
doi: 10.1002/nau.22489


PubMed Abstract
PMID: 23983149

UroToday.com Stress Urinary Incontinence Section