OBJECTIVES: To assess the predictive value of a simple clinical test (posterior vaginal wall pull down maneuver) in the diagnosis of intrinsic sphincter deficiency.
METHODS: The present prospective study included 62 women suffering from stress urinary incontinence. Every patient underwent a urogynecological examination including multichannel urodynamic testing (cystometry, urethral pressure profile, Valsalva Leak Point Pressure measurement) and a clinical examination including posterior vaginal wall pull down maneuver. Posterior vaginal wall pull down maneuver was carried out with the bladder filled with 400 mL of saline in a supine position, and was obtained by means of a split speculum allowing gentle pull down traction of the posterior vaginal wall. Posterior vaginal wall pull down maneuver was considered as positive when a urine leak was observed during the manoeuvre. Intrinsic sphincter deficiency was urodynamically defined by maximum urethral closure pressure ≤ 20 cmH2 O. Correlations between positive/negative posterior vaginal wall pull down maneuver and urodynamic intrinsic sphincter deficiency were calculated.
RESULTS: There was a statistical correlation between age and low maximum urethral closure pressure (P < 0.0001), and between low maximum urethral closure pressure and positive posterior vaginal wall pull down maneuver (P < 0.0001). Regarding the intrinsic sphincter deficiency diagnosis, the posterior vaginal wall pull down maneuver positive predictive value was 94.67% and the negative predictive value was 95.4%, with a specificity of 97.6% and sensitivity of 90%.
CONCLUSION: Posterior vaginal wall pull down maneuver is a reliable clinical test, easy to carry out, inexpensive and without significant risk. This test allows the diagnosis of intrinsic sphincter deficiency in women suffering from stress urinary incontinence, thus avoiding further invasive urodynamic testing (urethral pressure profile, Valsalva Leak Point Pressure measurement) in women with genuine stress urinary incontinence. Furthermore, it is helpful when choosing the type of sling procedure (retropubic vs transobturator) when a surgery is planned.
Written by:
Thubert T, Deffieux X, Jousse M, Guinet-Lacoste A, Ismael SS, Amarenco G. Are you the author?
Neuro-Urology Department of Tenon Hospital, University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France; Group of Clinical Research in Neuro-Urology, University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France; Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, University Paris 11, Clamart, France.
Reference: Int J Urol. 2013 Apr 21. Epub ahead of print.
doi: 10.1111/iju.12122
PubMed Abstract
PMID: 23600798
UroToday.com Stress Urinary Incontinence Section
