Positioning of a suburethral sling at the bladder neck is associated with a higher recurrence rate of stress urinary incontinence - Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the suburethral sling position and the outcome of anti-incontinence surgery.

METHODS: From 1998 to 2010, the medical records of 153 consecutive women with stress urinary incontinence undergoing the pubovaginal sling procedure were retrospectively reviewed. All patients received preoperative and postoperative transrectal sonography of the bladder and urethra, and the suburethral sling position was used to compare the postoperative continence status and lower urinary tract symptoms.

RESULTS: The mean patient age ± SD was 60.7 ± 10.6 years (range, 34-85 years), and the mean follow-up was 66.3 ± 42.1 months (range, 6-149 months). The slings were located at the bladder neck in 18 patients (11.8%), proximal urethra in 81 (52.9%), middle urethra in 45 (29.4%), and distal urethra in 9 (5.9%). The overall rate of recurrent stress urinary incontinence was 24.2% (37 patients). Among the 153 patients, there was a significantly higher stress urinary incontinence recurrence rate in the bladder neck group (bladder neck, 50.0%; proximal urethra, 18.5%; middle urethra, 22.2%; and distal urethra, 33.3%; P = .037). De novo urge and voiding symptoms occurred in 19.0% and 20.3% of overall patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in either de novo urge or voiding symptoms among groups.

CONCLUSIONS: Positioning of the suburethral sling at the bladder neck appears to be associated with a higher stress urinary incontinence recurrence rate. Patients with slings located at the proximal and middle urethra had the best postsurgical continence rates. The suburethral sling position had no direct association with de novo urge or voiding symptoms.

Written by:
Jiang YH, Wang CC, Chuang FC, Ke QS, Kuo HC.   Are you the author?
Department of Urology, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Hualien, Taiwan.

Reference: J Ultrasound Med. 2013 Feb;32(2):239-45.


PubMed Abstract
PMID: 23341378

UroToday.com Stress Urinary Incontinence Section