Kings College Hospital, United Kingdom.
PSD503 is a topical gel containing phenylephrine 20% weight/weight (w/w) intended for vaginal application close to the area of the urethral sphincter in women with SUI and has been used in patients with faecal incontinence. The primary objective of this proof of concept study was to evaluate the efficacy of PSD503 in women with SUI as measured by the change in pad weight following an exercise stress pad test. The secondary objectives were to evaluate plasma concentrations of PSD503, BP changes and pulse rate over 3h following administration and to assess safety and tolerability.
This was a phase II multi-centre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2 way cross-over study. Women were assessed objectively pre and post PSD503 administration using a standardised exercise stress pad test. Safety was assessed by monitoring pulse, BP and plasma levels of PSD503 over 3h following administration. A power calculation suggested a >80% power to demonstrate (at the 5% level of significance) a difference between treatments of 10-20g with a sample size of 30 patients.
14 patients were screened and 12 patients randomised over 20 months. Projections indicated the study would not attain its full quota within 1 year and it was terminated early. Treatment with PSD503 resulted in a greater reduction in pad weight gain than placebo, when expressed as both a percentage change (median % change: placebo - 38.00%, PSD503 - 54.33%) and absolute change (median absolute change: placebo - 10.0g, 20% (w/w) PSD503 - 22.0g) from pre-dose leakage. PSD503 was absorbed into the blood within 1h (median concentration 1.490ng/ml). Plasma concentrations at 3h (median 1.305ng/ml) were less than that at 1h and lower than plasma concentrations seen following phenylephrine-containing cold remedies. There were no withdrawals, serious adverse events and it was well tolerated overall.
This is the first proof of concept study to demonstrate that a topical α adrenergic agonist gel is rapidly and consistently absorbed vaginally and may have a role in the management of female SUI. However, since recruitment was difficult this may indicate that whilst objectively effective, acceptability in clinical practice may be poor.
Written by:
Robinson D, Abrams P, Cardozo L, Ellis-Jones J, Heath P, Wyllie M. Are you the author?
Reference: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Aug 8. Epub ahead of print.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.07.030
PubMed Abstract
PMID: 21831512
UroToday.com Stress Urinary Incontinence Section
