Parameters associated with unsuccessful pessary fitting for pelvic organ prolapse up to three months follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To clarify which parameters are associated with unsuccessful pessary fitting for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) at up to 3 months follow-up.

Embase, PubMed and Cochrane CENTRAL library were searched in May 2020. Inclusion criteria were: (1) pessary fitting attempted in women with symptomatic POP; (2) pessary fitting success among the study outcomes with a maximal follow-up of 3 months; (3) baseline parameters compared between successful and unsuccessful group. A meta-analysis was performed using the random effects model.

Twenty-four studies were included in the meta-analysis. Parameters associated with unsuccessful pessary fitting were: age (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56-0.86); BMI (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.08-1.70); menopause (OR 0.65 95% CI 0.47-0.88); de novo stress urinary incontinence (OR 5.59, 95% CI 2.24-13.99); prior surgery, i.e. hysterectomy (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.48-2.40), POP surgery (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.34-3.38), pelvic surgery (OR 1.81, 05% CI 1.01-3.26) and incontinence surgery (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.08-3.25); Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory-8 scores (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.22-3.02); solitary predominant posterior compartment POP (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.08-2.35); total vaginal length (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.32-0.97); wide introitus (OR 4.85, 95% CI 1.60-14.68); levator ani avulsion (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.35-4.53) and hiatal area on maximum Valsalva (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.27-2.80).

During counselling for pessary treatment a higher risk of failure due to the aforementioned parameters should be discussed and modifiable parameters should be addressed. More research is needed on the association between anatomical parameters and specific reasons for unsuccessful pessary fitting.

International urogynecology journal. 2022 Jan 17 [Epub ahead of print]

Claudia Manzini, Lisan M Morsinkhof, C Huub van der Vaart, Mariƫlla I J Withagen, Anique T M Grob

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands., Magnetic Detection and Imaging, Faculty of Science and Technology, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands., Multi-Modality Medical Imaging, Faculty of Science and Technology, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.