Objective: The relatively recent interest in critical men's health research has largely focused upon men's experiences of managing or preventing ill health.
There has been limited discussion on the decision making that men engage in with health practices that are not constructed as immediately imperative for their own well-being-such as vasectomy. Much of the research on vasectomy has tended to focus on the individualized decision making men, which can often decontextualize the process. This article seeks to address some of these absences.
Methods: This article reports on data from semistructured interviews with 28 men who had had vasectomies (16 with children, 12 without). Data were analyzed using Wetherell and Edley's synthetic approach to discourse analysis.
Results: Talking about vasectomy provided an opportunity for men to make sense of the self and the decision making processes within a complex and relational understanding of masculinities. Rather than an individualized decision making process, many of the men's accounts were reliant on stories of other men who the participants could be compared against.
Conclusions: Men made sense of an "optional" health decision in relation to other men (both real and imagined), in order to help justify delays, or other "trouble" in the decision making processes. Men's health initiatives and research may need to take this relational component of health decision-making into account.
Written by:
Terry G, Braun V. Are you the author?
Reference: Health Psychol. 2013 Jan;32(1):100-9.
doi: 10.1037/a0029081
PubMed Abstract
PMID: 23316858
UroToday.com Vasectomy Section
