Two-port laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) using a multichannel platform through the umbilicus and one additional 10-mm in the right iliac fossa has been recently described. We compare the perioperative and early results of this technique with a cohort of patients simultaneously treated in our institution with four-port LRC and a 7 to 10 cm midline incision.
A matched-pair study comparing perioperative outcomes, postoperative visual analog pain scale (VAPS), and morbidity of two-port (n=30) and four-port (n=30) LRC. Preoperative and perioperative data analyzed and compared included demographics, type of urinary diversion, operative time, blood loss, transfusion requirements, decrease in serum hemoglobin, operative complications, analgesic needs, length of stay, number of nodes removed, and other pathologic information. Complications in the first 3 months were evaluated according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.
There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding patient age, gender, body-mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, Charlson comorbidity index, tumor stage, percent of positive nodes, positive margin rate, number of nodes retrieved, proportion of neobladders, secondary carcinoma in situ, incidental prostate cancer, or need of systemic chemotherapy. Median operative time was 20 minutes higher in the two-port procedure, but this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.2). Estimated blood loss and differential hemoglobin change were lower in the two-port technique (each p=0.03), but no difference was detected regarding the intraoperative or postoperative transfusion rate. Length of hospital stay was also equivalent. Differences were not observed either in the number or severity of complications. VAPS at days 2, 3, and 5 was significantly lower for two-port LRC (p<0.01).
Two-port LRC performed through an umbilical platform and an accessory 10-mm port seems technically equivalent to standard four-port LRC. Perioperative outcomes regarding hospital stay and complications are tantamount. Diminished blood loss and, especially, less postoperative pain favor the reduced-port approach in this complex urologic minimally invasive procedure.
Journal of endourology / Endourological Society. 2015 Jun 26 [Epub ahead of print]
Javier C Angulo, Ana García-Tello, Erika Mateo, Helena Gimbernat, Cristina Redondo, Guillermo Andrés
Servicio de Urología, Fundación para la Investigación Biomédica del Hospital Universitario de Getafe , Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain . , Servicio de Urología, Fundación para la Investigación Biomédica del Hospital Universitario de Getafe , Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain . , Servicio de Urología, Fundación para la Investigación Biomédica del Hospital Universitario de Getafe , Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain . , Servicio de Urología, Fundación para la Investigación Biomédica del Hospital Universitario de Getafe , Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain . , Servicio de Urología, Fundación para la Investigación Biomédica del Hospital Universitario de Getafe , Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain . , Servicio de Urología, Fundación para la Investigación Biomédica del Hospital Universitario de Getafe , Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain .