AUA 2017: Surgical Approach Does Not Impact Positive Margin Rate in Partial Nephrectomy for Large Renal Masses
Given the limited literature evaluating the positive partial nephrectomy and margin status for large renal masses Dr. Ayangbesan sought to evaluate the relationship between positive surgical margins and surgical approach in partial nephrectomy for large renal masses, greater than 4cm. He also sought to identify independent factors associated with positive margin and assessed the impact of positive margins on overall patient survival.
Dr. Ayangbesan used the National cancer database to identify approximately 7500 patients from 2011 to 2013. The primary outcome for their evaluation was surgical margin status. Multivariable regression modeling was performed to identify patient, facility, and surgical factors, including surgical approach (open, laparoscopic, or robotic) on positive surgical margins in patients undergoing the partial nephrectomy procedure.
Of the approximately 7500 patients assessed 6.72% had positive surgical margins. Additionally analysis showed that age, African American race, education, rural setting, mixed histology, undifferentiated tumor grade, as well as having surgery performed at a non-academic facility were associated with positive surgical margins. However, surgical approach and stage were not associated with positive surgical margins.
Dr. Ayangbesan concluded that surgical approach is not independently associated with increased risk of PSM for large renal masses. Lastly, surgery at an academic facility was not associated with a positive margin.
Presented By: Abimbola Ayangbesan
Authors: Abimbola Ayangbesan, David Golombos,Padraic O'Malley, Patrick Lewicki, LaMont Barlow, Xian Wu, Paul Christos, Douglas Scherr
Affiliation: : New York, NY
Written By: Renai Yoon, MD, Department of Urology, University of California-Irvine
at the 2017 AUA Annual Meeting - May 12 - 16, 2017 – Boston, Massachusetts, USA